was the maximum that could be obtained?
The assembly of workers Wind SSGiovanni occurred on 11.21.2008 has been the only one so far, have failed to agree with the hypothesis of level 2.
Because such a result against an agreement that in the rest of Italy is having the full support of workers wind?
The explanation is simple, the reasons that led us to vote NO meets the objections made elsewhere in Italy, where then is the difference?
The main difference is that in a year and a half this company has ruined the lives of 365 families of Milan, in 2007 with the outsourcing of the 275 call center workers SSGiovanni, and a few months ago with the transfer of 90 workers in Rome, this behavior by Wind did raise the level of attention of workers in Milan.
1 - We do not trust 'the Wind.
2 - We do not trust 'MINUTES OF WARRANTIES (WHETHER BY THE COMPANY THAT AUDITORS)
3 - We no longer accept' THAT BETWEEN THE LOW AND NO, IT SHOULD ALWAYS ACCEPT ONLY THE LITTLE
To succeed in the general reasons for their workers to vote NO are SSGiovanni the following:
1 - Increased availability of economic, planned work, and the Network Port, which is required by the workers was fair in view of the rising cost of living in recent years, and was insufficient in view of the global economic crisis, which will lead us in the coming years more and more difficult living conditions. If the trend of the company must always be to play the downside when the initial requests are fair / insufficient, then the only solution must be that the OO SS begin to ask for more (in the voting for the platform in April to bring to the company, the shareholders of SSGiovanni had pointed out this problem and proposed an amendment calling for the increase of the three above items was a +40% instead of 30%)
2 - the transition from 5 th and 6 th for the workers of the FOR took bench for almost all the duration of the meeting, of course not all employees belong to the FO continue to wonder if it is ever acknowledged to them 10 years of professional work completed by the assurance that to continue this request will take care of the Training and Skills Commission was considered negatively. At the meeting was also attended by employees of the FO that although the recipients of the steps from 5 ° to 6 ° have voted against it anyway.
have regarded as serious, the lack of written guarantees on the criteria that will determine the level of passages give no guarantee to prevent the company for you to apply with the customary practice of patronage. Only by word of mouth has been agreed that the order in which the criteria are listed in the agreement, will correspond to the priorities of choice, so to speak until they have passed on the 6th level ones made in 1998 should begin the steps to the assumptions in 1999.
Sorry but the confidence of the workers SSGiovanni, this company has begun to lose in March 2007 to November 2008 and broke it completely lost if the unions believe they can still trust them is a verbal guarantee SSGiovanni decision that the employees do not support more.
3 - Regarding the Ticket Restaurant, it is normal that we appreciate the increase of € 1.5, but always in the voting in April on the platform to be presented to the company, had pointed out the inadequacy of demand especially in the face of a huge increase in cost of living. We do not know the reality of other cities, but for a regular meal (and for normal means first and second water) in Milan it takes 10 to 11 € (restaurants excluded of course).
It is not clear why an employee who for business reasons is unable to use the canteen must give up a regular meal, if not pagandoselo for mid to date, and a little 'less than half since January 2009 ..
4 - Finally, while recognizing the importance of finding a positive final written regulated and established practice for years, that shift MOTHER, who saw the possibility of maternal shift-workers of the Customer to request to obtain a fixed shift in the time slot 8-18.
It is not clear what were the criteria that led the company, (which is keen to let us know: "Having regard to the need to promote child care in the first months of life") to exclude from this facility, all mothers shift-workers who are not part of the Customer.
Per loro l’azienda si impegnerà a valutare compatibilmente con le esigenze tecnico organizzative, se e quando avrà riguardo anche dei loro figli.
Ci è stato detto “siete stati gli unici in Italia ad aver votato contro, non avete capito che era il massimo che potevamo ottenere”.
Vogliamo rispondere che l’abbiamo capito benissimo, ed è per questo che abbiamo VOTATO NO!!
· Era il massimo che si poteva ottenere con una piattaforma in cui le richieste (soprattutto quelle di carattere economico) partivano basse, nel formularle non si è dato il giusto peso all’operazione di ribasso che l’azienda ha puntualmente operato.
° was the maximum we could achieve with the forms of struggle adopted.
° was the maximum that could be achieved after years of addiction to negotiations that have seen the purchasing power of workers falling lower and lower, with dramatic consequences for the finances of families, that each worker Wind alone can judge according to the sacrifices that have to do to make ends meet.
° was the maximum that could be obtained, after years of addiction to the idea, claiming that the rights of workers, the demand for decent work, belong to another era.
For these reasons, the Assembly is against the idea agree 2nd level
Voters Favorable 22 2 20
Against Abstain 0
Delegates MSW Cub and Cobas
Sesto San Giovanni 11/21/2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment